Global Neurocare Works with the UN to Combat Neurological Disorders

A prominent neurologist and medical law specialist, Dr. James C. Johnston has been in private practice for nearly 30 years. In addition to his work as a neurologist, James C. Johnston, MD, JD, also serves as a partner with Global Neurology Consultants, where he is mostly concerned with improving health care quality and access in developing regions. To further this vision, Dr. Johnston founded Global Neurocare, a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing patient care and increasing medical training and research in developing countries such as Ethiopia.

Neurologists are scarce and resources limited in these developing regions, resulting in the needless deaths of those suffering from neurological disorders every day. Global Neurocare was granted Special Consultative Status with the United Nations in 2013, the highest status granted to a non-governmental organization. The Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) Committee at the United Nations looks at numerous applications to find non-governmental organizations that coincide with the aims and purposes of other United Nations programs.

Members of organizations granted Special Consultative Status are able to serve as UN delegates at sessions in various locations around the world. Global Neurocare’s status with the UN allows it to raise public awareness, implement international trade agreements, and provide expert analysis on relevant issues, among other benefits. Neurological disorders are recognized by the World Health Organization as one of the greatest threats to public health, and organizations such as Global Neurocare are poised to help with the crisis.

Advertisements

NON-COMMUNICABLE DISEASES: A GLOBAL HEALTH THREAT

Tokyo.skyline.waml[1]

World Association for Medical Law Congress in Tokyo on 6-8 August 2019.     

Non-communicable diseases (such as heart disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes) are collectively responsible for 7 out of 10 deaths in the world, 41 million people every year.  Many of these people die prematurely and the vast majority of these deaths are in the low income countries.  The World Health Organization considers non-communicable diseases to be one of the top ten global health threats.

The situation is even worse in the least developed nations that are facing a triple burden on ongoing infectious diseases, rapidly increasing non-communicable disease and the effects of globalization including accidents and injuries, compounded by a dearth of healthcare workers.

Neurologist and Attorney James C. Johnston, MD, JD and Neurologist Mehila Zebenigus, MD discussed these concerns at the 2018 United Nations (UN) High Level Political Forum in New York and provided specific recommendations for improving healthcare access in the least developed nations, particularly sub-Saharan Africa.

On behalf of Global NeuroCare® Drs. Johnston and Zebenigus published a written statement on improving healthcare as a strategy for poverty reduction at the UN 56th Commission for Social Development with specific recommendations for Member States to improve healthcare access.  Global NeuroCare® is a non-profit organization holding Special Consultative Status with the United Nations ECOSOC.  This allows Drs. Johnston and Zebenigus, as Directors of the NGO, to provide expert analysis on issues related to global health, make written and oral recommendation statements, and serve as UN Delegates at the United Nations sessions in New York, Geneva and Vienna.

Drs. James C. Johnston and Mehila Zebenigus reviewed their recommendations for improving healthcare in developing regions with leading international experts from over 40 countries at the 24th World Association for Medical Law Congress in Tel Aviv, Israel.  The WAML, in conjunction with the Israeli Ministry of Health and Tel Aviv University honored Dr. Johnston with the Inaugural Davies Award in Public Health.  Dr. Johnston dedicated the award to the Addis Ababa University Department of Neurology and donated the funds to Global NeuroCare.®

Drs. Johnston and Zebenigus have published another statement for the 57th Session of the UN Commission for Social Development addressing inequalities and challenges to social inclusion through advancing healthcare strategies.

They will also present these recommendations to the 25th  World Association for Medical Law Congress in Tokyo on 6-8 August 2019.

Medical Error: Third Leading Cause of Death in the United States

Medical Error Third Leading Cause of Death in the United States

Medical Error Third Leading Cause of Death in the United States

Role of Evidence-Based Guidelines in Medical Malpractice

Medical errors rank behind heart disease and cancer as the third leading cause of death in the United States (see BMJ 2016; 353:i2139), with over 250,000 deaths a year.  700 a day.  And despite tort reform, medical malpractice litigation will never entirely disappear.  It remains important for physicians to understand the elements of a malpractice claim not only to protect themselves but more importantly to improve patient care.

The most confusing aspect of a medical malpractice claim is the standard of care element, and this is further complicated by the increasing use of evidence-based guidelines (EBG) or practice guidelines.  In some countries, EBG provide the legal standard of care, while most common law countries such as UK, Australia and New Zealand place great reliance on guidelines but allow courts discretion in accepting them on a case by case basis.

In the United States, most courts allow testimony using EBG both for and against physicians.  Whether a particular guideline applies to a specific case is simply another argument for the expert witnesses with the jury deciding who to believe.  In most cases, the actual written EBG may not be admissible as an exhibit.  It would fall into the same category as learned treatises and medical journals – the witness can talk about it and be cross-examined, but the document itself is not admissible.  Some courts have adopted a more liberal approach by admitting EBG as demonstrative aids.  Regardless of which approach, a physician on trial for malpractice must recognize that although EBG are not sacrosanct, any deviation from the guideline represents a very powerful argument to the judge or jury.

Neurologist and Attorney James C. Johnston, MD, JD and renowned medical malpractice attorney Thomas P. Sartwelle published the seminal article on expert witnesses discussing guidelines in the Journal of Child Neurology (http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0883073813479669).

Dr. James C. Johnston is one of the very few neurologists in the world that is also qualified in law, and licensed to practice both professions.  He wrote the comprehensive chapter on advancing a neurology malpractice claim in Preparing and Winning Medical Negligence Cases, Third Edition (http://www.jurispub.com/Neurology-Chapter-11-Preparing-And-Winning-Medical-Negligence-Cases-Third-Edition.html).

He has published a number of journal articles and book chapters on how neurologists can improve patient care and protect themselves from malpractice claims.  These publications include book chapters in multiple editions of the American College of Legal Medicine textbook Legal Medicine and Medical Ethics, the Medical Malpractice Survival Handbook, and the landmark three volume treatise Legal and Forensic Medicine.  Dr. Johnston has published peer-reviewed articles in Neurology Clinics, Journal of Child Neurology, Headache, Medical Law International, Journal of Legal Medicine, Medicine and Law, and a number of other journals.

In a recent Neurologic Clinics, Dr. Johnston published a case studies article highlighting specific neurology claims related to malpractice (https://www.neurologic.theclinics.com/article/S0733-8619(16)30011-1/abstract).  This was co-authored with Thomas P. Sartwelle and leading neurosurgeon Professor Dr. Knut Wester, with the purpose of providing recommendations to improve patient care and safety.

GLOBAL NEUROLOGY REPORT: PROTECTING HEALTH SECURITY

Dr. James Christopher Johnston

Disease outbreaks are no longer confined to small geographical areas, but have the potential to impact any region of the world due to an increasingly interconnected population combined with the dynamic nature of disease patterns.  This creates a global risk that must be managed through a coordinated approach in order to effectively control any type of epidemic.  The World Health Organization (WHO) promulgated International Health Regulations (IHR) to provide an overarching legal framework defining each nation’s duties in handling public health risks that are likely to cross borders.  The IHRs constitute a legal agreement among 194 nations.  These Regulations define when and how a country must report a disease outbreak to WHO, and highlight specific criteria for categorizing an outbreak as a “public health emergency of international concern,” which then triggers a very specific response.  Additionally, the Regulations contain provisions designed to protect the economy of a country that does declare an international emergency.  For example, these provisions preclude other nations from enacting travel or trade embargoes without a clear public health justification.  Neurologist and Attorney Dr. James C. Johnston is uniquely qualified to deal with the very specialized area of international medical law affecting health security.  He recently presented policy recommendations on these security matters to the United Nations High Level Political Forums on behalf of Global NeuroCare®, a non-government organization which holds Special Consultative Status with the United Nations ECOSOC.

GLOBAL NEUROLOGY REPORT: THE PERILS OF FETAL MONITORING IN AFRICA

Dr. James C Johnston

Maclean’s news recently interviewed neurologist and attorney Dr. James C. Johnston, his Ethiopian colleague and neurology Professor Dr. Mehila Zebenigus and Rwandan neurologist Dr. Jules Nshimiyimana for an editorial discussing the perils of using electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) in Africa.

Western medical advances exported to developing nations are supposed to improve healthcare and save lives.  However, “The West sometimes exports not just its medical advances, but its medical mistakes.”  This is unquestionably the case with EFM, a procedure that causes more harm than good.

EFM has been a birth myth for fifty years.  It is the standard of care in the West despite overwhelming evidence that it is ineffectual, rife with interpretive errors, has a 99% false positive rate, and has completely failed to reduce the incidence of cerebral palsy or any other neonatal neurological disorder.  EFM has, however, dramatically increased the caesarean section rate.  And C-sections create needless dangers to mothers and babies, increase risks in future pregnancies, and may account for an increased risk of future chronic diseases and neuropsychiatric disorders in children.

Why is this sham procedure being used against all scientific evidence?  To protect physicians and hospitals from lawsuits, as well as generate significant revenue.  And doing the procedure is not only medically harmful, but it completely neglects patient autonomy and informed consent.

Drs. Zebenigus and Johnston, along with renown medical ethicist Professor Berna Arda and leading medical malpractice attorney Thomas P. Sartwelle have discussed these concerns in the peer reviewed literature with publications in the Journal of Child Neurology, British Medical Journal, Journal of Maternal Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Journal of Childhood and Developmental Disorders, Surgery Journal, Medical Law International, Neurologic Clinics and several other publications including the Legal Medicine and Medical Ethics textbook of the American College of Legal Medicine.  Many of these articles are freely available at ResearchGate.net:  https://www.researchgate.net/profile/James_Johnston6.

The more serious problem is that EFM is now being pushed in Africa, where the potential damage from a useless procedure is compounded by the utter waste of very limited resources.  The global fetal monitoring market is a multi-billion dollar business, and most of the growth in the next decade is projected to be in developing regions such as sub-Saharan Africa.  Drs. Zebenigus and Johnston have already seen the use of EFM machines increasing in Ethiopia, and Dr. Jules and other physicians report the same in Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, Uganda and other countries.

The cost of the EFM machines, training staff to read a useless test, and the resulting unnecessary C-sections all drain valuable resources that would be better used to care for children who have cerebral palsy.

“EFM has made birth less safe in the United States – and now, through a kind of medical imperialism, it is poised to potentially make birth less safe throughout the world.”

Read the Maclean’s news article at:

https://www.macleans.ca/society/health/the-use-of-electronic-fetal-monitoring-is-expanding-into-africa-and-thats-a-problem/